Ethics Of AI: 193 Members Of UNESCO Adopt Recommendations

In a historic global agreement, all 193 members of UNESCO adopt the recommendations on the ethics of AI document

In a historic global agreement on 25 November 2021, all 193 members of the United Nations Educational, Science and Cultural Organisation adopted the “Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence”. However, the recommendations are not a binding agreement, rather guidelines that nations can follow voluntarily. 

Overview of the Document 

The document acknowledges the “profound and dynamic” impact of AI on human lives and contemporary societies and how it affects education, social and natural sciences, culture, etc. 

Moreover, UNESCO recognises the potential that AI possesses in terms of benefitting ecosystems and the environment. 

On the other hand, UNESCO, in its document, highlights the dangers of AI. It raises ethical concerns surrounding the gender and ethnic biases that are “embedded” in algorithms which may “exacerbate” inequality, exclusion and threats to cultural, social and ecological diversity. The document further raises AI red flags by stating that AI technology may deepen a divide between countries. 

In this regard, UNESCO Chief Audrey Azoulay says, “The world needs rules for artificial intelligence to benefit humanity. The Recommendation on the ethics of AI is a major answer. It sets the first global normative framework while giving States the responsibility to apply it at their level.” 

Ethics of AI: Values and Principles

The document defines the scope and provides a universal framework of values and principles of the ethics of AI within its scope. The definition of AI within the document includes and is not limited to machine learning, machine reasoning, cyber-physical systems, IoT, and all stages of AI systems life cycle (process, person, enterprise). 

The objective of the document is to guide the actions of the stakeholders in embedding the ethics of the AI, promote human rights and fundamental freedom in all stages of the AI life cycle, and promote equitable access to development and knowledge in the field of AI between the global north and south nations. The recommendations explicitly ban the use of AI social scoring and mass surveillance and advocate stronger data protection. 

The text principally calls for:

  • Fairness and Non-Discrimination- Fairness implies sharing the benefits of AI technologies at local, national and international levels while considering the specific needs of different marginalised and vulnerable populations.
  • Sustainability- AI technologies must be continually assessed for their social, cultural, economic and environmental impact.
  • Privacy– Human autonomy and agency must be respected, and data must be collected, shared, archived and deleted ethically. The document also calls for data protection through frameworks and government mechanisms set up by regulatory bodies. In addition, algorithmic systems must undergo privacy impact assessment, which includes societal and ethical considerations.
  • Safety and Security– Unwanted harm and vulnerability to attack should be avoided by developing privacy-protective data access frameworks that foster better training AI models. 
  • Transparency and Explainability- Transparency ensures respect for human rights principles. Explainability refers to making intelligible and insightful outcomes to the AI system. 
  • Responsibility and Accountability- Similar to transparency and explainability, the principle ensures human rights and freedom. 
  • Awareness and Literacy- Public awareness and understanding of AI technologies and the value of data must be promoted through open and accessible education to all. 

Political Scenario 

Interestingly, nations like China and Russia who have a comprehensive mass surveillance system, have voted to adopt AI Ethics Recommendations. The USA, a country that houses the most number of AI companies, is not a part of UNESCO, thus, not a signatory to the document. However, in an interview with Politico, UNESCO’s Assistant Director-General for Social and Human Sciences, Gabriela Ramos, argues that the nation’s policies can be pressured by global unity on the subject. 

More Great AIM Stories

Abhishree Choudhary
Abhishree is a budding tech journalist with a UGD in Political Science. In her free time, Abhishree can be found watching French new wave classic films and playing with dogs.

More Stories

OUR UPCOMING EVENTS

8th April | In-person Conference | Hotel Radisson Blue, Bangalore

Organized by Analytics India Magazine

View Event >>

30th Apr | Virtual conference

Organized by Analytics India Magazine

View Event >>

MORE FROM AIM
Yugesh Verma
All you need to know about Graph Embeddings

Embeddings can be the subgroups of a group, similarly, in graph theory embedding of a graph can be considered as a representation of a graph on a surface, where points of that surface are made up of vertices and arcs are made up of edges

Yugesh Verma
A beginner’s guide to Spatio-Temporal graph neural networks

Spatio-temporal graphs are made of static structures and time-varying features, and such information in a graph requires a neural network that can deal with time-varying features of the graph. Neural networks which are developed to deal with time-varying features of the graph can be considered as Spatio-temporal graph neural networks. 

Yugesh Verma
A guide to explainable named entity recognition

Named entity recognition (NER) is difficult to understand how the process of NER worked in the background or how the process is behaving with the data, it needs more explainability. we can make it more explainable.

3 Ways to Join our Community

Discord Server

Stay Connected with a larger ecosystem of data science and ML Professionals

Telegram Channel

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest updates from AIM