The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been in the limelight these last few weeks. And for good reason, too. It is an extensive document, to say the least. One reporter found that the number of pages in the document are enough to cover a football field — which is 360 feet long and 360 feet wide.
The document has been in the pipeline since the former Vice-President of the European Commission Viviane Reding initiated it in 2012 and it finally went into effect on 25 May. It seeks to not only set the standard for data protection and privacy in Europe but across the globe for all “data subjects” (read: anyone on the internet anywhere).
The GDPR makes two critical changes to the Data Protection Directive of 1995 that preceded it. First, it emphasises the universal nature of the legislation. For any legislation to apply to all world citizens, this is undoubtedly a prerequisite. The GDPR tries to prescribe the best possible rules and practices for data regulation that can be common to citizens of all nations. Second, it is legally binding. Any company that breaks the regulation is liable to pay up to 4 percent of their worldwide sales as retribution.
This, of course, is a macroscopic view of the regulation that is presented by experts. The regulation is still expected to have loopholes. To device perfect laws in complicated matters such as protection of data privacy is close to impossible. The GDPR will be prone to discrepancies in interpretation and implementation. Nonetheless, some things are as clear as daylight in it. The document is strongly against companies sharing personal data of their users or customers with any third parties. If this must be done, it must be after gaining prior permission, or at risk of serious consequence.
Viviane Reding, referred to the recent Facebook Cambridge Analytica scandal to make this clear. She said, “The Facebook Cambridge Analytica scandal, if it had happened on 26 May, this year, would have cost billions of euros to Facebook, among others. You cannot hand over the personal data of citizens without having asked if the citizens agree that you hand it over. And you cannot steal it and just tell them after. That is not possible anymore, according to the new law. If you do, then the penalties will be very, very severe.”
The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been in the limelight these last few weeks. And for good reason, too. It is an extensive document, to say the least. One reporter found that the number of pages in the document are enough to cover a football field — which is 360 feet long and 360 feet wide.
The document has been in the pipeline since the former Vice-President of the European Commission Viviane Reding initiated it in 2012 and it finally went into effect on 25 May. It seeks to not only set the standard for data protection and privacy in Europe but across the globe for all “data subjects” (read: anyone on the internet anywhere).
The GDPR makes two critical changes to the Data Protection Directive of 1995 that preceded it. First, it emphasises the universal nature of the legislation. For any legislation to apply to all world citizens, this is undoubtedly a prerequisite. The GDPR tries to prescribe the best possible rules and practices for data regulation that can be common to citizens of all nations. Second, it is legally binding. Any company that breaks the regulation is liable to pay up to 4 percent of their worldwide sales as retribution.
This, of course, is a macroscopic view of the regulation that is presented by experts. The regulation is still expected to have loopholes. To device perfect laws in complicated matters such as protection of data privacy is close to impossible. The GDPR will be prone to discrepancies in interpretation and implementation. Nonetheless, some things are as clear as daylight in it. The document is strongly against companies sharing personal data of their users or customers with any third parties. If this must be done, it must be after gaining prior permission, or at risk of serious consequence.
Viviane Reding, referred to the recent Facebook Cambridge Analytica scandal to make this clear. She said, “The Facebook Cambridge Analytica scandal, if it had happened on 26 May, this year, would have cost billions of euros to Facebook, among others. You cannot hand over the personal data of citizens without having asked if the citizens agree that you hand it over. And you cannot steal it and just tell them after. That is not possible anymore, according to the new law. If you do, then the penalties will be very, very severe.”


Your reaction
Discussion
What's your take on this story?
No comments yet — be the first to share your view.