The last time Google made a buzz about quantum computing was when it launched the world’s biggest quantum computer processor — the 72 qubit Bristlecone that bested IBM’s efforts, IBM 50 qubit processor. The Mountain View giant quickly claimed that If a quantum processor can be operated with low enough error, it would be able to outperform a classical supercomputer on a well-defined computer science problem, an achievement known as quantum supremacy.
Well, now Google is back to claiming supremacy in quantum computing with a 2016 paper titled, Characterising quantum supremacy in near-term devices that presented how in the near future, quantum devices without error correction can carry out well-defined computational task beyond the capabilities of state-of-the-art classical computers, achieving so-called quantum supremacy. The Google Research team claims it is the strongest theoretical proposal to prove an exponential separation between the computational power of classical and quantum computers.
The last time Google made a buzz about quantum computing was when it launched the world’s biggest quantum computer processor — the 72 qubit Bristlecone that bested IBM’s efforts, IBM 50 qubit processor. The Mountain View giant quickly claimed that If a quantum processor can be operated with low enough error, it would be able to outperform a classical supercomputer on a well-defined computer science problem, an achievement known as quantum supremacy.
Well, now Google is back to claiming supremacy in quantum computing with a 2016 paper titled, Characterising quantum supremacy in near-term devices that presented how in the near future, quantum devices without error correction can carry out well-defined computational task beyond the capabilities of state-of-the-art classical computers, achieving so-called quantum supremacy. The Google Research team claims it is the strongest theoretical proposal to prove an exponential separation between the computational power of classical and quantum computers.


Your reaction
Discussion
What's your take on this story?
No comments yet — be the first to share your view.