Key takeaways
- The Budget 2017-18 aims to bolster India's Smart Cities initiative through increased funding and incentives.
- Investment for Smart City projects is estimated between INR 1300 crores and INR 6000 crores, focusing on infrastructure improvements.
- INR 1,188 crore has been allocated for six specific Smart Cities in Karnataka, part of a broader mission involving around 60 cities.
- Key areas needing government funding include sanitation, waste management, transit systems, and clean water supply.
New Delhi: Finance Minister Arun Jaitley (C) stands outside his office at North Block holding the briefcase containing the Union budget for 2017 and is flanked by MoS Arjun Meghwal (3rd R) and Santosh Gangwar (3rd L), on Wednesday,in New Delhi. PTI Photo by Vijay Verma(PTI2_1_2017_000009B)
The Indian Government’s much talked about Smart Cities initiative is hoping to get a boost, based on the upcoming Budget 2017-18 session. Key players are hoping added incentives can affect the development and infrastructure vastly. According to experts, Smart City plans require an investment of INR 1300 crores to INR 6000 crores in rebooting infrastructure from ground up – improving basic urban infrastructure, water and sanitation, improving public amenities and roads. These funds would be rolled out depending on the need for infrastructure and other requisites for a Smart city.
According to a news report, INR 1,188 crore has been earmarked for six Smart Cities in Karnataka as part of the budget. The six cities are -- Mangaluru, Belagavi, Tumakuru, Shivamogaa, Hubballi-Dharwad and Davanagere. According to a news report, around 60 cities are part of the Smart City Mission program and the selection was made based on the plans submitted.
Some of the key areas that require Government funding are – sanitation, solid waste management, building rapid transit systems and improving clean water supply. As per news reports, the projects are billed to operate in two ways -- build, own operate (BOO) and build operate transfer (BOT). There might be a visible lag in the funds provided by the government which would need to be met by private participation.

