AIM Banners_978 x 90

Legally speaking – Artificial Intelligence is not even close to human intelligence

AI inventions are ready to get patents, but legally, they are not ‘natural humans’ and cannot receive any rights. With DABUS receiving a fresh rejection from EPO, the debate continues.
In public proceedings, the Legal Board of Appeal of the EPO confirmed that under the European Patent Convention (EPC), an inventor designated in a patent application must be a human being. This was the judgement in combined cases J 8/20 and J 9/20, where the board just dismissed the applicant's appeal. Here, both the applications were made by a Missouri physicist Stephen Thaler, whose AI-system DABUS had made the inventions. Device for the Autonomous Bootstrapping of Unified Sentience, or DABUS, is a computer system programmed to invent by itself. It is, basically, a swarm of disconnected neutral nets that can continuously generate thought processes and even memories that can, over time, generate new and inventive outputs independently. The Legal Board of Appeal also said that only a
Subscribe or log in to Continue Reading

Uncompromising innovation. Timeless influence. Your support powers the future of independent tech journalism.

Already have an account? Sign In.

📣 Want to advertise in AIM? Book here

Picture of Meeta Ramnani
Meeta Ramnani
Meeta’s interest lies in finding out real practical applications of technology. At AIM, she writes stories that question the new inventions and the need to develop them. She believes that technology has and will continue to change the world very fast and that it is no more ‘cool’ to be ‘old-school’. If people don’t update themselves with the technology, they will surely be left behind.
Related Posts
AIM Print and TV
Don’t Miss the Next Big Shift in AI.
Get one year subscription for ₹5999
Download the easiest way to
stay informed